Automotive Design and Production

JUL 2014

Automotive Design & Production is the one media brand invested in delivering your message in print, online, via email, and in-person to the right automotive industry professionals at the right time.

Issue link: https://adp.epubxp.com/i/335957

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 14 of 52

AD&P; > July 2014 > TALK > Marginal > Gary S. Vasilash > gsv@autofeldguide.com 10 He explains the diference with a vignette involving a foreman and a plant manager and a defective safety part. The foreman goes in to the manager's ofce with the bad part and asks what he should do. The manager tells him that if it happens again, he should bring in the bad part. A week later, the fore- man shows up again with another defective part. "But when the man- ager asks him about the conditions under which the defect occurred, the foreman stammers incoherently." So the manager tells the foreman, again, that if a bad part shows up, to bring it to him. Ten days later, it happens. But this time, the foreman tells the manager what caused the defect and what countermeasure was taken. Explains Shingo, "The frst two times, the foreman merely perceived that a defect had occurred. The third time, having understood what the manager had in mind"— remember, the manager asked about the conditions—"he thought about why the defect might have occurred." It's not that we need less perceiving. But we need more thinking, espe- cially if we are to address waste, not merely the waste that occurs in manufacturing operations, but in the whole product development cycle, from ideation to execution. We need to ask why? a whole lot more than we probably do. Shingo identifes fve times (presumably this is a minimum): 1. "Why do we need this object? 2. Why do we require this subject? 3. Why use this kind of method? 4. Why this kind of space? 5. Why this kind of time?" While these particular whys are addressed by Shingo at the "fve elements of production," or "5W1H,"— "1. What? (object), 2. Who? (sub- ject), 3. How? (method), 4. Where? (space), 5. When? (time), 6. Why?"— again it seems clear that if we are to pursue sustainability in what we do, regardless of where we are in the product development cycle, regardless of what it is that we pro- duce, then these are things that we need to address in all activities that we pursue. We need to think, not just perceive. Otherwise, we might be like those idiots that Shingo identifed. 0714ADP Marginal -- Digital Version.indd 10 6/17/2014 1:12:57 PM

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Automotive Design and Production - JUL 2014