Automotive Design and Production

MAR 2013

Automotive Design & Production is the one media brand invested in delivering your message in print, online, via email, and in-person to the right automotive industry professionals at the right time.

Issue link: https://adp.epubxp.com/i/111486

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 9 of 51

AD&P; > March 2013 > TALK > Insights from IHS > Michael Robinet > ihs.com The E���ects of Globalization Around the World Michael Robinet, Managing Director, IHS Automotive Consulting Seemingly every continent has a vehicle production superpower (Western Europe has several) seeking to re���ne itself in the midst of an industry which is quickly globalizing, seeking to reduce currency risk and attempting to move closer to the ���nal consumer. Australia still has three OEMs with vehicle production facilities resident in the country���s SouthEast industrial breadbasket. Ford, Toyota and General Motors (Holden) all have various levels of stand-alone operations, including vehicle build, powertrain production, and vehicle development capabilities. Mitsubishi dropped out a couple of years ago. The remaining companies are struggling to de���ne an equation which ensures long-term pro���tability and viability. In 2012, Australian light vehicle output stood at ~228,000 units, an average of less than 80,000 units for each of its three full-���edged production companies. Other countries ���nding difculty ���tting within the new global reality include Sweden, Belgium, France, Italy, Taiwan, Canada and even Japan. What has changed to drive a more treacherous path for Australia and this unlikely lot of cohorts? The list includes scale economies, converging global regulations, risk mitigation, shifting end markets, logistics costs escalation, and evolving trade regimes. While history has shown that nothing can be considered constant in our fast-paced world, the events of the last decade with respect to the surge toward globalization from that of a regional context has been unkind to these countries. Except for Canada, France and Japan, these production locations have fallen below 1-million annual production units. Each one has witnessed a quick decline in the production to sales ratio (typically well over 1 for ���export��� focused countries) ��� a measure of the success of a country���s export program. An evolution from an industry centered on regional vehicles driven from regional platforms to that of global platforms with regional variants is a subtle though critical diference. Regional platforms block any real production ���exibility between regions while escalating total global development costs. The adage that regional platforms were required due to the unique characteristics of a particular market are quickly washing away as global emissions, fuel economy and safety standards converge and thus enable fewer unique combinations. 8 Appropriate scale is beginning to call the efcient continuation of operations into question. This is the case for Sweden, Australia, and, to an extent, Canada. For years, scale economies were brushed under the rug as industry participants learned few lessons from the true heavyweights of global scale: Toyota, Honda and Volkswagen. As successive platforms shift to a global basis, new potential competitors emerge for exports. In the case of General Motors, exports of Holden vehicles have declined due to the increase of options Middle East customers are now ofered and the growth of more efcient choices from other OEMs. Global Production Position Much has been written about the auto industry���s globalization and the impact on its various participants: OEMs, suppliers and governments. Many countries which once were major players from a vehicle production/export perspective are ���nding it difcult to even ���nd their niche today. A recent family trip to Australia and New Zealand drove the point home. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Global Production Output Position 2000 2010 2020 France Canada Italy Belgium Taiwan Australia Sweden p Changes in production predicated on the globalization of the industry. An ugly byproduct of declining production is the impact on the supply base. The lack of scale also impacts tier I/II suppliers domestically due to scale and costs to import the appropriate inputs, and also handcufs their ability to be competitive outside their market ��� a double-edged sword. All industries must evolve, though the only constant of change in the auto industry is that it will never cease. New production locations have emerged due to growing domestics markets, the ease of global platform integration. China, India, Thailand, and South Africa are just a handful of examples. Mexico can also be included in this club due to enhanced trade access to key export markets. Countries witnessing a decline in output are faced with few alternatives to support this critical industry. The march of time is cruel to many, kind to few. Michael Robinet has been a managing director of IHS Automotive Consulting since 2011. Prior to that, he was the director of Global Production Forecasts for IHS Automotive. His areas of expertise include global vehicle production and capacity forecasting, future product program intelligence, platform consolidation and globalization trends, trade ���ow/ sourcing strategies, and OEM footprint/logistics trends. INSIGHTS FROM IHS

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Automotive Design and Production - MAR 2013